Morality in the Law: The Psychological Foundations of Citizens’ Desires to Punish Transgressions
An article from the most recent Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences. I'll be adding to the list of publications that this blog monitors.
John M. Darley
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540; email: jdarley@princeton.edu
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Vol. 5: 1-23 (Volume publication date December 2009)
(doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172335)
First published online as a Review in Advance on July 29, 2009
Morality in the Law: The Psychological Foundations of Citizens’ Desires to Punish Transgressions
Abstract
Evidence from a number of research methods converges to suggest that when a person registers a transgression against self or others, the person experiences an intuitively produced, emotionally tinged reaction of moral outrage. The reaction is driven by the just deserts–based retributive reactions of the person to the transgression rather than, for instance, considerations of the deterrent force of the punishment. In experimental games arranged so that trust and fairness transgressions occur, participants punish transgressors and experience rewarding brain states while doing so, and they punish even if they were not themselves the target of the violation. What, if any, implications does this have for the punishment component of societal systems of justice? Would it be possible to construct sentencing practices that, to some extent, incorporated citizens’ sense of just punishments? What would be gained by doing so? And what would be lost?
Technorati Tags: psychology, educational psychology, forensic psychology, neuropsychology, ABA, American Bar Association, Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, mental retardation, intellectual disability, Atkins cases, morality and law, morality and punishment, criminal psychology, criminal justice
