In his speech when accepting the 2011 APA Division 33 Jacobson award, Stephen Greenspan made the following comment
Unfortunately, the typical Atkins hearing is less a quest for the truth about individuals than it is a quest for the truth about IQ or adaptive behavior test scores. This is not a new concern, but the much higher stakes in capital cases bring the inadequacies in defining and diagnosing ID into greater relief. Unfortunately, the “physics emulation” phenomenon seems to be getting worse rather than better, in part because the same “scientistic” (superficial embrace of scientific trappings) emphasis on SD‐based cutting scores that has characterized the prong one (intelligence) now seems to have taken over prong two (adaptive functioning), as reflected in new wording in both AAIDD‐11 and in a DSM‐5 draft. Concern about the need for a more responsible approach to testifying in Atkins cases has brought about efforts by myself and colleagues about how ID should and should not be evaluated in criminal proceedings (Greenspan, 2009d, 2011b).
Dr. Greenspan has been an extremely vocal and consistent critique of past and current definitions of intellectual disability. An abridged version of his complete speech was printed in the latest APA Division 33 newsletter (click here and go to page 4), with a note at the end indicating that those who want a copy of the entire speech should contact Dr. Greenspan.
Kudos to Dr. Greenspan for his continued efforts to improve the definition of MR/ID
- Posted using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad
An attempt to provide understandable and up-to-date information regarding intelligence testing, intelligence theories, personal competence, adaptive behavior and intellectual disability (mental retardation) as they relate to death penalty (capital punishment) issues. A particular focus will be on psychological measurement, statistical and psychometric issues.
Showing posts with label APA Division 33. Show all posts
Showing posts with label APA Division 33. Show all posts
Monday, January 23, 2012
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Dr. Greg Olley's APA Div 33 Presidential address on Atkins MR/ID death penalty issues
The Death Penalty, the Courts, and What We Have Learned about Intellectual Disability. APA Div 33 Presidential Address by Dr. Greg Olley.
Dr. Greg Olley's Presidential Address (Div 33) was devoted to issues surrounding Atkins MR/ID death penalty issues. It is worth a read. I have tremendous respect for Greg's experience, knowledge and insight. His article starts on page two of the division newsletter.
- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad
intelligence intelligence testing Atkins cases ICDP blog psychology school psychology neuropsychology Forensic psychology criminal psychology criminal justice death penalty capital punishment ABA IQ tests IQ scores adaptive behavior AAIDD mental retardation intellectual disability Flynn effect practice effects SEM standard error of measurement APA Division 33 American Psychological Association Greg Olley 8
Dr. Greg Olley's Presidential Address (Div 33) was devoted to issues surrounding Atkins MR/ID death penalty issues. It is worth a read. I have tremendous respect for Greg's experience, knowledge and insight. His article starts on page two of the division newsletter.
- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad
intelligence intelligence testing Atkins cases ICDP blog psychology school psychology neuropsychology Forensic psychology criminal psychology criminal justice death penalty capital punishment ABA IQ tests IQ scores adaptive behavior AAIDD mental retardation intellectual disability Flynn effect practice effects SEM standard error of measurement APA Division 33 American Psychological Association Greg Olley 8
Labels:
APA,
APA Division 33,
Atkins
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)