An attempt to provide understandable and up-to-date information regarding intelligence testing, intelligence theories, personal competence, adaptive behavior and intellectual disability (mental retardation) as they relate to death penalty (capital punishment) issues. A particular focus will be on psychological measurement, statistical and psychometric issues.
Friday, December 30, 2011
Atkins MR/ID Death Penalty Court Decisions: Ortiz v US (2011) and Blue v Thaler (TX, 201)
Thanks to Kevin Foley for sending me two recent Atkins decisions.
The first is Ortiz v US (2011). A prior decisions regarding this case are here. I will not comment on this case as I provided an expert deposition and was also part of the amicus brief by Concerned Experts in Mental Retardation/Intellectual Disability.
The second is Blue v Thaler (TX, 2011), with a prior 2010 decision also being available. Of interest was the courts treatment (or lack thereof) of the Flynn Effect.
"The Court of Criminal Appeals refuses to apply the Flynn Effect in Atkins cases. Blue, 230 S.W.3d at 166 (“This Court has never specifically addressed the scientific validity of the Flynn Effect. Nor will we attempt to do so now. Rather than try to extrapolate an accurate IQ by applying an unexamined scientific concept to an incomplete test score, we will simply regard the record as it comes to us as devoid of any reliable IQ score.”). This comports with the federal jurisprudence stating that the Flynn Effect “has not been accepted in [the Fifth] Circuit as scientifically valid[.]” Mathis, 443 F.3d at 433 n.1 (citing In re Salazar, 443 F.3d 430, 433 n.1 (5th Cir. 2006)). The Court will not apply the Flynn Effect to lower the results of Blue’s IQ scores."
So what we have is a federal appeals court which won't address the Flynn Effect or even mention it by name - all based on a false assumption made in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals - that the FE is an unexamined scientific concept. I disagree with this assessment as considerable evidence has been presented regarding the scientific acceptance of the Flynn Effect by intelligence scholars.
Posted via DraftCraft app
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
USA TODAY: 'Speeding train' interrogations can fuel false confessions
'Speeding train' interrogations can fuel false confessions
http://usat.ly/us6YLk
To view the story, click the link or paste it into your browser.
To learn more about USA TODAY for iPad and download, visit: http://usatoday.com/ipad/
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Kevin McGrew, PhD
Educational Psychologist
IQs Corner Intelligent Insights e-paper now more comprehensive
IQs Corner e-paper is now greatly expanded in coverage.
Go to www.iqscorner.com to subscribe.
Posted via DraftCraft app
Monday, December 26, 2011
Top-Ten Recent SSRN Downloads
Sent from my KMcGrew IPhone
Research briefs 12-26-11
Murphy, P. (2011). The Psychiatrist as Expert Witness, 2nd edition, by T.G. Gutheil. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(5), 365-366.
Robst, J., Constantine, R., Andel, R., Boaz, T., & Howe, A. (2011). Factors related to criminal justice expenditure trajectories for adults with serious mental illness. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(5), 350-362.
Vinkers, D. J., DeBeurs, E., Barendregt, M., Rinne, T., & Hoek, H. W. (2011). The relationship between mental disorders and different types of crime. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(5), 307-320
Posted via DraftCraft app
Saturday, December 24, 2011
NeruroLaw@TheNeuroScience, 12/24/11 7:26 AM
Neuro Science (@TheNeuroScience) 12/24/11 7:26 AM NeuroLaw: Do we have a responsibility to use neuroscience to inform law? sns.mx/qvi8y4 |
Sent from my KMcGrew IPhone
Friday, December 23, 2011
NEW RESOURCES: Bureau of Justice Statistics Releases Capital Punishment, 2010
The Bureau of Justice Statistics released its annual report on capital punishment in the United States in December 2011, containing tables and information on the death penalty for the previous year (2010). Information drawn from the report includes:
- Those executed in 2010 spent the longest time on death row, on average, than inmates executed in any previous year. The average time between sentencing and execution for all those executed in 2010 was 14.8 years.
- During 2010, 119 inmates were removed from under sentence of death: 53 were removed as a result of sentences or convictions overturned or commutations of sentences, and 20 died by means other than execution. Of the 119 inmates, only 46 (38%) were executed.
- By the end of 2010, 388 individuals of Hispanic origin were under the sentence of death, accounting for 12% of the nation's death row populations.
- Four states (California, Florida, Texas and Pennsylvania) accounted for more than 50% of all inmates on death row.
- Of the 7,879 inmates under sentence of death between 1977 and 2010, only 16% had been executed. Six percent (6%) died by causes other than execution, and 39% received other dispositions.
(Bureau of Justice Statistics, Capital Punishment, 2010 - Statistical Tables, December 2011). For information on the death penalty in 2011, see also DPIC's Year End Report. See Death Row and Sentencing.
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Jochnowitz on Capital Jurors and Mitigating Evidence
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Sunday, December 18, 2011
Top-Ten Recent SSRN Downloads
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Cautions on neuroscience in courtroom@PsychNews, 12/17/11 9:01 PM
Psychology News (@PsychNews) 12/17/11 9:01 PM Royal Society Warns Against Legal Uses of Neuroscience bit.ly/ucrj4b |
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Friday, December 16, 2011
BBC News - Age of criminal responsibility 'too low', experts say
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Levy & Sinnott-Armstrong on Insanity Defenses
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Research Briefs: Medical Law Review special issue on mental health and the law
GloverThomas, N. (2011). THE AGE OF RISK: RISK PERCEPTION AND DETERMINATION FOLLOWING THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2007. Medical Law Review, 19(4), 581-605.
GloverThomas, N. (2011). Special issue: Mental Health Law in Motion - Confronting New Challenges in the Modern Psychiatric Landscape. Medical Law Review, 19(4), 507-513.
McHale, J. V. (2011). MENTAL HEALTH LAW AND THE EU: THE NEXT NEW REGULATORY FRONTIER? Medical Law Review, 19(4), 606-635.
Mcsherry, B., & Wilson, K. (2011). DETENTION AND TREATMENT DOWN UNDER: HUMAN RIGHTS AND MENTAL HEALTH LAWS IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND. Medical Law Review, 19(4), 548-580.
Posted via DraftCraft app
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
National Science Foundation New Funding Solicitation - Arlington, VA
The Law & Social Sciences (LSS) Program at the National Science Foundation is pleased to announce the release of a new funding solicitation. There are full proposal target dates of Jan. 24, 2012, July 16, 2012, and July 15 annually thereafter.
The LSS program supports social scientific studies of law and law-like systems of rules. Successful proposals describe research that advances scientific theory and understanding of the connections between law or legal processes and human behavior. The program funds the best proposals submitted within the field broadly defined, regardless of specific subfield, and strives to support an interdisciplinary community of scholars studying relevant topics.
nh
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Neuroscience and the law@TheBrainScience, 12/14/11 5:34 PM
Brain Science (@TheBrainScience) 12/14/11 5:34 PM Will Neuroscience Revolutionize the Legal System? Not Any Time Soon. sns.mx/Ymfdy4 |
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Roberts and Lipnevich in "General to Multiple Intelligences": CHC model and WJ III, WISC-IV Integrated, SB5, KABC-III
This chapter is part of the above refernced book available at the following link:
http://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4311503.aspx
Posted via DraftCraft app
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Neuroscience and the Law (News and Features)
Researchers can describe differences in the brains of psychopaths, addicts, and developing humans (a k a teenagers), compared with normally behaving adults. But no one is ready to predict a person's behavior based on a brain scan, warned panelists during a public symposium at the recent Society for Neuroscience annual meeting.
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Deep thoughts about thoughts and punishment
Via SSRN, I just saw this interesting new article titled "Neuroscience, Normativity, and Retributivism" by Michael Pardon and Dennis Patterson, which comes with this abstract:
From sentencing and law blog
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Death Penalty and LWOP Conference at the University of Miami
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Monday, December 12, 2011
Death by Jury: Group Dynamics and Capital Sentencing
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Kevin McGrew, PhD
Educational Psychologist
Right to Neuropsychological Examination for Death Sentence Mitigation
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Kevin McGrew, PhD
Educational Psychologist
Jury Instructions Regarding Death Penalty Mitigating Factors
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Kevin McGrew, PhD
Educational Psychologist
Meeting the Needs of Those Persons With Serious Mental Illness Who Are Most Likely to Become Criminalized
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Kevin McGrew, PhD
Educational Psychologist
Sunday, December 11, 2011
The Kentucky Death Penalty Assessment Report
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Atkins MR/ID Death Penalty Decision: "When in doubt...give 'em a hearing." Guest post by Kevin Foley re Branch v Epps (2011)
This is a quest post by Kevin Foley.
Atkins MR/ID Death Penalty Court Decisions: Anderson v Arkansas (2004, 22011)
In 2004 Anderson was granted a new sentencing hearing. He was sentenced to death and file a petition for post-conviction relief. The petition was denined and that 2011 decison affirms the denial of the petition.
Technorati Tags: Atkins cases, mental retardation, intellectual disability, Anderson v Arkansas, Atkins death penalty, death penalty, capital punishment
Friday, December 9, 2011
Book nook: "Deathquest: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment in the United S
The fourth edition of Robert Bohm's "Deathquest: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment in the United States," is now available through Anderson Publishing.
(R. Bohm, "Deathquest: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment in the United States," Forthcoming in 2012).
<snip>. Rest of post can be read at link below
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
'Thank God for the Lawyers': Some Thoughts on the (Mis)Regulation of Scientific Misconduct@SSRN, 12/9/11 12:07 PM
SSRN (@SSRN) 12/9/11 12:07 PM This Week's Top 5 Papers: bit.ly/rWm0L8 #SSRN |
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
The brain on trial@Neurotechnology, 12/9/11 2:01 PM
Brain Technology (@Neurotechnology) 12/9/11 2:01 PM The brain on trial, several experts discuss the rising influence of neuroscience in the courtroom kavlifoundation.org/science-spotli… |
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
American Bar Association Releases Assessement of Kentucky's Death Penalty
On December 7, the American Bar Association released a report assessing Kentucky's system of captial punishment and calling for a halt to executions in the state.
(Press Release, "Two Year Assessment of Death Penalty Procedures Prompts Call for Suspension of Executions in Kentucky," American Bar Association, December 7, 2011). Read full report here. See Representation and Studies.
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Monday, December 5, 2011
Atkins MR/ID Court Decision: Hill v Humphrey (GA; 2011; 11th Circuit Court) 2011)
Saturday, December 3, 2011
Primus on Federal Habeas Law
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Thursday, December 1, 2011
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law Table of Contents for 1 December 1975; Vol. 3, No. 4
Subject: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law Table of Contents for 1 December 1975; Vol. 3, No. 4
JAAPL Online Table of Contents Alert
Home Current Issue Archives Contact Subscribe Alerts Help
JAAPL Online Table of Contents Alert
- A new issue of Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online is available online:
- 1 December 1975; Vol. 3, No. 4
- The below Table of Contents is available online at: http://www.jaapl.org/content/vol3/issue4/index.dtl?etoc
ARTICLES
- Editorial
- Henry H. Foster, ESQ.
- J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1975;3 iv
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/iv
- The Tort Liability of the Psychiatrist
- Sue Ellen Fishalow
- J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1975;3 191-230
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/191
- Aphasia and the Expert Medical Witness
- Richard T. Rada, Bruce E. Porch, and Robert Kellner
- J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1975;3 231-237
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/231
- The Right of the Defendant to Refuse an Insanity Plea
- Olga M. Bruning
- J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1975;3 238-244
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/238
- The Influence on Judges' Sentencing Practices of a Mental Evaluation
- Gerald Cooke and Eric Pogany
- J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1975;3 245-251
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/245
- Cross-Cultural Forensic Psychiatry in Alaska
- Joseph D. Bloom
- J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1975;3 252-256
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/252
- Causative Factors in Violence
- Warren S. Wille
- J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1975;3 257-261
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/257
- The Devil's Advocate
- Henry H. Foster, ESQ.
- J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1975;3 263-264
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/263
BOOK REVIEWS
- Malpractice Made Easy—Can You Believe That?
- Alan R. Rosenberg and Jonas R. Rappeport
- J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1975;3 262
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/262
The 5th Annual ABA Journal Blawg 100
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad