APLS workshops at 2011 annual conference
AP-LS WorkshopsMarch 2, 2011The *4th International Congress on Psychology and Law*, which includesAP-LS, the European Association of Psychology and Law<mhtml:{9A6DC475-F1CE-41CD-8A34-C5CEFD2A9150}mid://00000672/!x-usc:http://www.law.kuleuven.ac.be/eapl/>, and the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry,Psychology and Law<mhtml:{9A6DC475-F1CE-41CD-8A34-C5CEFD2A9150}mid://00000672/!x-usc:http://www.anzappl.org/> is pleased to announce the following preconference workshops beingheld on March 2, 2011 at the Miami Regency Hyatt<mhtml:{9A6DC475-F1CE-41CD-8A34-C5CEFD2A9150}mid://00000672/!x-usc:http://www.miamiregency.hyatt.com/>. Please note that the Early Registration (reduced rate) deadline is*January 31, 2011*. You can register for the workshops on the AP-LSwebsite (www.ap-ls.org ). The American Psychology-Law Society isapproved by the American Psychological Association to sponsorcontinuing education for psychologists. AP-LS maintains responsibilityfor this program and its contents.Full-Day Workshops (8:00 am - 5:00 pm) *7 CE Credits**Workshop A: Assessment, Treatment, & Risk Management of SexualOffenders**Presenter: Robin J. Wilson, Ph.D., ABPP*This workshop is designed for students and working professionalsinterested in issues related to sexual offending and contemporaryWestern society. Workshop topics will be generally at an intermediatelevel, but the curriculum will appeal to both new and seasonedprofessionals. *Learning Objectives:* (1) Identify how sexual offending has affectedcontemporary Western societies; (2) List some of the keycharacteristics of victim and offender populations; (3) Outline someof the difficulties inherent in assessing sexual offenders; (4) Listand explain the principles of effective correctional interventions;(5) Critically appraise the efficacy of sexual offender riskmanagement protocols. *Workshop B: Assessing High Risk Youth: Conceptual and MethodologicalChallenges**Presenter: Lorraine Johnstone, D.Clinical Psychology*This workshop, derived from diverse literatures including delinquencyresearch (e.g. the Cambridge, Dunedin and Pittsburgh Youth Studies),developmental psychology, developmental psychopathology, violence riskassessment, forensic research, and mental health research, willpromote reflective practice and encourage a critical analysis of theliterature for the purposes of identifying how progress might beachieved in assessing violence risk in youth.*Learning Objectives:* (1) Discuss complex case presentations thattypically characterize children and young people who perpetrateviolence; (2) Summarize the main protocols for assessing risk ofviolence and sexually harmful behavior; (3) List conceptual anddevelopmental challenges associated with this practice; (4) Explainmethodological limitations that characterize the literature andassessment approaches; (5) Describe how to produce defensibledecisions that are appropriately developmentally and methodologicallyinformed.* **Workshop C: Treating offenders with mental illness: Toward anevidenced-based intervention**Presenters: Robert Morgan, Ph.D., Daryl Kroner, Ph.D.*The workshop reviews the empirical literature regarding: (a)prevalence of mental illness in criminal justice settings; (b)presenting mental health needs; (c) service utilization; and (d)impact of incarceration on offenders with mental illness (OMI). Thisworkshop will then review the empirical literature regarding whatworks when intervening with offenders as well as persons with mentalillness. The remainder of this workshop will focus specifically onmental health interventions developed for OMI, with emphasis onempirically supported interventions. We will conclude this workshop bypresenting a treatment model and assessment plan for intervening withOMI.*Learning Objectives:* (1) Recognize prevalence of mental illnessamong offenders in the criminal justice system; (2) Identify effectivecorrectional interventions for offenders; (3) Identify effectivemental health interventions for persons with mental illness; (4)Identify a theoretical model to guide clinical interventions with OMI;(5) Identify the role and mechanism of assessment in the treatmentprocess of OMI.* **Workshop D: Introducing the Comprehensive Assessment of PsychopathicPersonality (CAPP)**Presenters: David Cooke, Ph.D., Stephen Hart, Ph.D.*The CAPP provides a dynamic and comprehensive assessment of thesymptoms of psychopathic personality disorder (PPD), which can be usedto assess the severity of symptoms over time. The CAPP covers the fulldomain of PPD symptomatology, and this is potentially useful incorrectional, forensic, civil, community, and family settings.*Learning Objectives: *(1) Explain the need for a clinically basedcomprehensive model of psychopathy; (2) Examine the process used todevelop this model; (3) Describe the model in detail; ( 4) Demonstratethe approach used to evaluate a case in terms of the model; (5)Discuss the importance of this model of psychopathy in individual caseformulation.Half-Day Workshops (E: 8:00 am – 12:00pm / F: 1:00 pm – 5:00 pm)*3.5 CE Credits**Workshop E: The Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments**Presenters: Naomi Goldstein, Ph.D., Heather Zelle, Ph.D., AlanGoldstein, Ph.D.*The content of this workshop involves a description of the revisionsto the Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreciation ofMiranda Rights (Grisso, 1998) when creating the Miranda RightsComprehension Instruments (MRCI; Goldstein, Zelle, & Grisso, 2011).The original Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreciationof Miranda Rights have been widely recognized as the recommendedinstruments for assessing capacities of defendants to have waivedtheir rights during custodial interrogation proceedings Nonetheless,the instruments required updating this workshop will review thedevelopment process of and key changes in the creation of the revisedinstruments. It also will review research with the MRCI that isrelevant to the use of the instruments in forensic practice.*Learning Objectives:* (1) Recognize changes from Grisso's originalInstruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreciation of MirandaRights; (2) Identify key similarities and differences inadministration and scoring procedures between the original and revisedinstruments; (3) Describe the process of interpreting examinees'responses and scores for presentation in forensic evaluation reports;(4) Summarize the instruments' development process and psychometricproperties to aid in admissibility hearings; (5) Address key questionsabout the instruments during court testimony.* **Workshop F: Causal Inference Using Propensity Scores**Presenter: Thomas Loughran, Ph.D*Researchers are often interested in assessing effects from eventswhich cannot be experimentally manipulated (e.g., arrest orinstitutional placement) but are handicapped by selection biases. Thisworkshop introduces propensity scores, a powerful method to derivecausal effects from observational data. *Learning Objectives:* (1) Explain the logic of propensity scorematching; (2) Estimate treatment effects from non-experimental data;(3) Easily estimate these models using Stata; (4) Explain themethodology and results to nontechnical audiences; (5) Discuss thelimitations of propensity scores.For more information, please contact Karen Galin<mhtml:{9A6DC475-F1CE-41CD-8A34-C5CEFD2A9150}mid://00000672/!x-usc:mailto:kgalin@geocareinc.com>, Ph.D. (kgalin@geocareinc.com), Pre-Conference Workshop Chair--If you do not want to receive any more emails from the AmericanPsychology-Law Society, http://www.ap-ls.org/phplist/?p=unsubscribe&uid=90d2d7b5f2f0aa6c38a95fb3bde97dd5--Powered by PHPlist, www.phplist.com --