A comment from Mike Charlton, who was Webster’s atty, and who is a very good death penalty atty just in general, and sent with his permission.
Cecil R. Reynolds, PhD
Emeritus
Professor of Educational Psychology
Professor of Neuroscience
Distinguished Research Scholar
Texas A&M University
512-656-5075
From: mike charlton [mailto:charltonlegal@
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 1:05 PM
To: Cecil R. Reynolds; Philip Wischkaemper
Cc: JOHN E. WRIGHT; John Niland
Subject: Re: FW: [NASP-Listserv] Deadly Catch-22 in Atkins MR/ID decision 2 days ago
actually bruce webster was my client for a while. gary taylor and phil wischkaemper did his federal writ (bruce is on federal death row) and when gary left, I came in with phil. after we lost in the 5th and scotus on a straight up Atkins issue, (which was very well tried - Denis Keyes was the defense expert), Dorsey and Whitney took over and they found the new evidence.
Technorati Tags: psychology, forensic psychology, forensic psychiatry, neuropsychology, intelligence, school psychology, psychometrics, educational psychology, IQ, IQ tests, IQ scores, adaptive behavior, adaptive functioning, intellectual disability, mental retardation, MR, ID, criminal psychology, criminal defense, criminal justice, ABA, American Bar Association, Atkins cases, death penalty, capital punishment, AAIDD, Atkins MR/ID listserv, ICDP blog, Webster v US, Obama clemency, Webster clemency