- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
An attempt to provide understandable and up-to-date information regarding intelligence testing, intelligence theories, personal competence, adaptive behavior and intellectual disability (mental retardation) as they relate to death penalty (capital punishment) issues. A particular focus will be on psychological measurement, statistical and psychometric issues.
Thursday, August 28, 2014
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Article: Understanding Dual Diagnosis: Intellectual Disability and Mental Health
Understanding Dual Diagnosis: Intellectual Disability and Mental Health
http://aaidd.org/education/education-archive/2014/07/10/understanding-dual-diagnosis-intellectual-disability-and-mental-health#.U_3Jv2NgAjq
Sent via Flipboard
Monday, August 25, 2014
Article: Assessing Intellectual Functioning and Adaptive Behavior
Assessing Intellectual Functioning and Adaptive Behavior
http://aaidd.org/education/education-archive/2014/07/10/assessing-intellectual-functioning-and-adaptive-behavior#.U_si-2NgAjq
Sent via Flipboard
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
FYI. The MindHub web portal has been updated
http://themindhub.com/
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
Saturday, August 16, 2014
Sharing Comparisons of Five Performance Validity Indices in Bona Fide and Simulated Traumatic Brain Injury via BrowZine
Comparisons of Five Performance Validity Indices in Bona Fide and Simulated Traumatic Brain Injury
Bashem, Jesse R.; Rapport, Lisa J.; Miller, Justin B.; Hanks, Robin A.; Axelrod, Bradley N.; Millis, Scott R.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 28 Issue 5 – 2014: 851 - 875
10.1080/13854046.2014.927927
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.927927
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.927927
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Sharing Are Verbal Intelligence Subtests and Reading Measures Immune to Non-Credible Effort? via BrowZine
Are Verbal Intelligence Subtests and Reading Measures Immune to Non-Credible Effort?
Sawyer, R. John; Young, J. Christopher; Roper, Brad L.; Rach, Amanda
The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 28 Issue 5 – 2014: 756 - 770
10.1080/13854046.2014.920922
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.920922
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.920922
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Sharing One-Week Practice Effects in Older Adults: Tools for Assessing Cognitive Change via BrowZine
Duff, Kevin
The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 28 Issue 5 – 2014: 714 - 725
10.1080/13854046.2014.920923
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.920923
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.920923
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
Article: Assessing Intellectual Functioning and Adaptive Behavior
Assessing Intellectual Functioning and Adaptive Behavior
http://aaidd.org/education/education-archive/2014/07/10/assessing-intellectual-functioning-and-adaptive-behavior#.U-tae2NCwjq
Sent via Flipboard
****
Sunday, August 10, 2014
"Scientizing Culpability: The Implications of Hall v. Florida and the Possibility of a 'Scientific Stare Decisis'" [feedly]
----
"Scientizing Culpability: The Implications of Hall v. Florida and the Possibility of a 'Scientific Stare Decisis'"
// Sentencing Law and Policy
The title of this post is the title of this notable new paper available on SSRN authored by Christopher Slobogin. Here is the abstract:
The Supreme Court's decision in Hall v. Florida holds that "clinical definitions" control the meaning of intellectual disability in the death penalty context. In other words, the Court "scientized" the definition of intellectual disability. This article discusses the implications of this unprecedented move. It also introduces the idea of scientific stare decisis — a requirement that groups that are scientifically alike be treated similarly for culpability purposes — as a means of implementing the scientization process.
----
Shared via my feedly reader
Friday, August 8, 2014
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
The Richard Woodcock Institute for Advancement of Cognitive Assessment: Oct, 25, 2014
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad