Controlling for increased guessing enhances the independence of the Flynn effect from g: The return of the Brand effect
Woodley, Michael Anthony; te Nijenhuis, Jan; Must, Olev; Must, Aasa
Intelligence, Vol. 43 – 2014: 27 - 34
10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.004
University of Minnesota Users:
https://www.lib.umn.edu/log.phtml?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613001761
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613001761
An attempt to provide understandable and up-to-date information regarding intelligence testing, intelligence theories, personal competence, adaptive behavior and intellectual disability (mental retardation) as they relate to death penalty (capital punishment) issues. A particular focus will be on psychological measurement, statistical and psychometric issues.
Saturday, January 25, 2014
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Article: Reliability coefficients are for squares. Confidence interval widths tell it to you straight.
Reliability coefficients are for squares. Confidence interval widths tell it to you straight.
http://assessingpsyche.wordpress.com/2014/01/16/reliability-is-for-squares/
Sent via Flipboard
Monday, January 13, 2014
The Death Penalty and Intellectual Disability: AAIDD forthcoming pub--TOC with authors and chapter titles
The Death
Penalty and Intellectual Disability: A Guide (1/3/14)*
*
Note the
above title is as registered by AAIDD with Library of Congress and as presentedon their website. The working title of the task force had been: Determining Intellectual Disability in the
Courts: Focus on Capital Cases
As described at the AAIDD publications page:
In the 2002 landmark decision Atkins v. Virginia 536 U.S. 304, the
Supreme Court of the United States ruled that executing a person with
intellectual disability is a violation of the Eighth Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution, which prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment,” but
left states to determine their own criteria for intellectual
disability. AAIDD has always advocated against the death penalty
for people with intellectual disability and has long provided amicus
curiae briefs in Supreme Court cases. Thus, in this comprehensive new
book published by AAIDD, notable authors in the field of intellectual
disability discuss all aspects of the issues, with a particular focus
on foundational considerations, assessment factors and issues, and
professional concerns in Atkins assessments.
Chapter
|
Titles
|
Authors
|
Preface
|
Ed Polloway
|
|
Foreword
|
Honorable Kevin Foley
|
|
Part 1: Foundational Considerations
|
||
1
|
Guide for Persons with Intellectual Disability and Capital Cases:
An Introduction
|
Edward A. Polloway
James R. Patton
J. David Smith
|
2
|
Intellectual Disability: A Review of its Definitions and Diagnostic
Criteria
|
Marc J. Tassé
|
3
|
Mild Intellectual Disability
|
Gary Siperstein
Melissa Collins
|
4
|
Analysis of Atkins
Cases
|
John Blume
Karen Salekin
|
Part 2: Assessment
Considerations
|
||
A. General Topics:
|
||
5
|
Concepts of Measurement
|
Keith Widaman
|
6
|
Age of Onset and the Developmental Period Criterion
|
Stephen Greenspan
George Woods
Harvey Switzky
|
B. Intellectual Functioning:
|
||
7
|
Intellectual Functioning: Conceptual Issues
|
Kevin McGrew
|
8
|
Consideration in the Selection and Analysis of IQ
Tests
|
Dale Watson
|
9
|
Variability of IQ scores
|
Stephen Greenspan
J. Gregory Olley
|
10
|
Norm Obsolescence: The Flynn Effect
|
Kevin McGrew
|
C. Adaptive Behavior:
|
||
11
|
Evolving Concepts of Adaptive Behavior
|
Stephen Greenspan
|
12
|
Selection of Appropriate Adaptive Behavior
Instruments
|
J. Gregory Olley
|
13
|
Challenges in Assessment of Adaptive Behavior in
Capital Cases
|
Caroline Everington
Gilbert S. Macvaugh III
Karen Salekin
Timothy J. Derning
|
14
|
Time at Which Disability Must Be Shown in Atkins Cases
|
J. Gregory Olley
|
15
|
Briseño Factors
|
Stephen Greenspan
|
Part 3: Related
Topics
|
||
16
|
Cultural Factors in Assessment
|
Richard Ruth
|
17
|
Assessment Issues: Competence to Waive Miranda Rights and Competence to Stand
Trial
|
Karen Salekin
Caroline Everington
|
18
|
Considerations of Retrospective Assessment and Malingering
|
Denis Keyes
David Freedman
|
19
|
Intellectual Disability, Comorbid Disorders and
Differential Diagnosis
|
George Woods
David Freedman
Timothy J. Derning
|
20
|
School and Other Key Records
|
James Patton
|
21
|
Relevance of Other Assessments in Atkins Evaluations
|
Karen Salekin
Gilbert S. Macvaugh III
Timothy J. Derning
|
22
|
Professional Issues in Atkins Assessments
|
Gilbert S. Macvaugh III
Mark D. Cunningham Marc J. Tassé
|
The WJ IV is comming! Stay tunned for new updates, insights, answers to questions, etc.
If you have wondered why I have not posted as much creative and original content at my blog the past 5+ years, it has been due to our work to revise and re-standardize the WJ III battery. We are rounding the final corner and Riverside Publishing has officially launched the WJ IV web page, where pre-orders, at a special discount, are being currently being taken.
This is a blatant self-promotional post. I am a coauthor of the WJ III and WJ IV and thus have a financial interest in its sales (see conflict of interest disclosure statement; which needs to be updated to reflect the WJ IV).
I am very proud to have worked on this project and believe that those who conduct psychological and educational assessments will be pleased with many of the revisions, additions, and new features. You can learn more at the Riverside WJ IV web page link above.
In the not so distant future I will be making many WJ IV-related blog posts to explain the changes, answer questions posted on listservs, and also provide insights based on yet-to-be published analyses of the norm data and special studies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)