Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
An attempt to provide understandable and up-to-date information regarding intelligence testing, intelligence theories, personal competence, adaptive behavior and intellectual disability (mental retardation) as they relate to death penalty (capital punishment) issues. A particular focus will be on psychological measurement, statistical and psychometric issues.
Monday, May 30, 2011
TFYiPOST: Top-Ten Recent SSRN Downloads
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Friday, May 27, 2011
FYiPOST: Can A Test Really Tell Who's A Psychopath? : NPR
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Atkins MR/ID Death Penalty Court Decisions: Update on Bedford v Ohio (2011)
Last month a decision re: Bedford v Ohio was posted. Again, Kevin Foley alerted me to recent developments regarding a subsequent district and federal court decisions which resulted in Bedord's recent execution (click here for newspaper story).
- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad
intelligence intelligence testing Atkins cases ICDP blog psychology school psychology neuropsychology forensic psychology criminal psychology criminal justice death penalty capital punishment ABA IQ tests IQ scores adaptive behavior AAIDD mental retardation intellectual disability Bedford v Ohio
Generated by: Tag Generator
FYiPOST: Top-Ten Recent SSRN Downloads
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Beyond IQ (aka Forrest Gump effect): Why there is more to academic achievement than IQ?
Click on image to enlarge. Additional comments and links to other sources are embedded in annotated article as per IQs Reading feature.
Below is model of personal competence from article referenced (with link) in PDF of article.
- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad
intelligence IQ tests IQ testing IQ scores CHC intelligence theory CHC theory Cattell-Horn-Carroll human cognitive abilities psychology school psychology individual differences cognitive psychology neuropsychology neuroscience psychology special education educational psychology psychometrics psychological assessment psychological measurement IQs Corner general intelligence trait complexes personality conative motivation achievement school learning MACMM model Beyond IQ
Generated by: Tag Generator
Research brief: Accounting for degree of linguistic demand in IQ test directions
- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad
intelligence IQ tests IQ testing IQ scores CHC intelligence theory CHC theory Cattell-Horn-Carroll human cognitive abilities psychology school psychology individual differences cognitive psychology neuropsychology neuroscience psychology special education educational psychology psychometrics psychological assessment psychological measurement IQs Corner general intelligence linguistic demand culture culture and IQ
Generated by: Tag Generator
Thursday, May 19, 2011
FYiPOST: Annual Habeas Corpus Training for Capital Post-Conviction Attorneys
This free program offers 5.0 CLE credits* and is for attorneys who currently represent or are considering representation a capital client in habeas proceedings. This five hour (9 a.m. to 2 p.m.) CLE program features nationally-recognized death penalty and habeas corpus experts. The program will include a review of recent Supreme Court decisions, a panel on cutting edge legal issues in habeas practice, and an exercise focusing on ethical considerations faced by habeas lawyers. There will also be two simultaneous sessions on habeas corpus, with one session for attorneys new to habeas work and one for more experienced attorneys. The session will be followed by a luncheon with a keynote address.
For more information and to register, please contact Muhammad U. Faridi at (212) 336-1282 or mfaridi@pbwt.com.
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Atkins MR/ID Death Penalty Court Decision: Wilson (TX, 2010,2011) loses on remand
This is a new decision related to the Texas case of Wilson which was previously posted in August 2010, at that time with a guest blog post by Kevin Foley.
The latest decision (Wilson v Thayler, 2011) is now included in the Court Decisions blogroll. Kevin Foley provides the following guest comments regarding this latest decision.
Marvin Lee Wilson Loses on Remand Guest blog comments by Kevin Foley.
Marvin Lee Wilson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus relief, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the district court and ordered that, “The district court shall consider Petitioner’s motion and the full state Atkins record under the current law.” Apparently, the federal district court denied the habeas corpus claim without having the complete state court record before it. [Click here for copy of decision]
The district court’s resolution of the Atkins claim on remand was disappointing, to say the least. The district court stated that the state trial court’s decision was, “less than clear”, a comment that is a red flag to any lawyer, because it is an indication that, in some respects, one may not be able to tell just what the trial judge did or what reasoning he used. The district court’s discussion seemed to go downhill from here. Incredibly, the district court pointed out that, “the state court did not explicitly state that Wilson suffered from significantly sub-average general intellectual functioning [nor did the trial court make a specific finding about Wilson’s level of intellectual finding] . . . The state court also did not make explicit findings and reached no explicit conclusions as to whether Wilson had significant limitations in adaptive functioning, and it made no explicit finding as to whether Wilson’s significantly alleged sub-average intellectual functioning and significant limitations in adaptive skills ( if he had them) occurred prior to the age of eighteen”. What is going on here? How can a court rule on a mental retardation claim without making findings on the three elements of the diagnosis? Well, what the trial court did was - at least according to the federal habeas corpus judge – “The state court made explicit findings as to each of the seven Briseño factors”, the dubious judge-created “test” for whether a capital defendant is mentally retarded. It is a discouraging development in the land of Atkins jurisprudence that a court can adjudicate a mental retardation case without making findings on the three major elements of the diagnosis, instead relying mostly on the so-called Briseño factors - and have such a effort survive appellate and habeas corpus review.
[Blogmaster comment. Click here for all prior posts that touch on the Texas Briseno standards]
- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad
Atkins MR/ID Death Penalty Court Decisions: Hines v Thaler (TX,2011) and Bedford v Ohio (2011)
I am again behind in posting of Atkins MR/ID court decisions. Kevin Foley continues to send me recent decisions and I need to get caught up. This is an FYI (with no comments) post regarding two recent decisions.
-Hines v Thaler (TX, 2011). This is a new decision related to prior decisions in 2010.
Also,
Bedford v Ohio (2011)
Both will be added to Court Decisions blogroll in a few minlutes.
- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad
intelligence intelligence testing Atkins cases ICDP blog psychology school psychology neuropsychology forensic psychology criminal psychology criminal justice death penalty capital punishment ABA IQ tests IQ scores adaptive behavior AAIDD mental retardation intellectual disability Hines v Thaler Bedford v Ohio
Generated by: Tag Generator
FYiPOST: The curious story of 'a reasonable degree of professional certainty'
Guest post by Mark D. Worthen, Psy.D.*
Expert witnesses who testify based on their medical, psychological, or other scientific training and expertise, are often asked to express their opinions "to a reasonable degree of medical (or psychological or scientific) certainty." But what does this phrase mean and why is it used in legal proceedings?
<snip>
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
FYiPOST: Scientific Evidence, Experts and the "Future" of Evidence in courts conference@thenjc, 5/17/11 11:51 AM
Natl. Jud. College (@thenjc) 5/17/11 11:51 AM Scientific Evidence, Experts and the "Future" of Evidence http://ow.ly/4WDkG |
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Monday, May 16, 2011
FYiPOST: Mental disability claim prompts execution stay in Ohio (and lots more litigation, I suspect)
As detailed in this new AP story, "federal judge in Ohio is halting the execution of a man who was convicted in the 1984 shootings of his ex-girlfriend and her boyfriend but says he doesn't remember the slayings." Story at li k below.
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
FYiPOST: Top-Ten Recent SSRN Downloads
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Saturday, May 14, 2011
FYiPOST: Weaving Functional Brain Imaging into the Tapestry of Evidence: A Case for Functional Neuroimaging in Federal Criminal Courts by Adam Teitcher :: SSRN
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Friday, May 13, 2011
FYiPOST: Alesini and La Ferrara on Testing Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Research brief: Simplifying Miranda right warnings so they are understood by people with cognitive or language limitations
- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad
intelligence intelligence testing Atkins cases ICDP blog psychology school psychology neuropsychology forensic psychology criminal psychology criminal justice death penalty capital punishment ABA IQ tests IQ scores adaptive behavior AAIDD mental retardation intellectual disability Miranda Miranda warning Miranda rights
Generated by: Tag Generator
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
FYiPOST: Top-Ten Recent SSRN Downloads
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Interesting stuff on graphical abstracts of research articles
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/graphicalabstracts
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Kevin McGrew, PhD
Educational Psychologist
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Why Academics should blog@BrainCosmos, 5/7/11 2:38 AM
Brain (@BrainCosmos) 5/7/11 2:38 AM Why Academics Should Blog: A College of One's Own bit.ly/m3PUnn |
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Friday, May 6, 2011
Atkins MR/ID Court Decision: Turner v US (FL; 2011)
Thanks again to Kevin Foley for sending me this interesting case with a brief summary overview.
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided the William Turner case. The case was an application for permission to file a subsequent federal habeas corpus claim. The 11th Circuit denied the application, and in doing so, upheld the Florida Courts' denial of Turner's Atkins claim.
After Atkins was decided, Turner sought to prove he was ID. Apparently, he initially presented the courts with evidence that he obtained childhood IQ scores of 72 and 73. Eventually, the Florida trial court appointed two experts to assess Turner. Turner obtained a FSIQ of 98 on the WAIS-III and a FSIQ of 108 on the SB-5. The trial court summarily denied the claim, without an evidenciary hearing, on the basis that there was no way Turner could show he was ID. The FL Supreme Court affirmed.
Of some significance was the fact that Turner served a combat tour in Vietnam and was honorably discharged from the military. He also graduated from high school - according to the 11th Circuit:
"Turner graduated from high school in the third quartile of his class and attended junior college [which] also refutes Turner’s contention."
His lawyers were nonplussed. Similar to the another recent case commented on via a guest blog post by Kevin Foley, the attorneys appeared to believe that all they had to show was that Turner was ID before age 18. As for the problem with the 26 or 36 point gain in IQ (depending on whether you look at the WAIS-III or the SB-5) from childhood to adult, the attorneys argued in their brief to the Florida Supreme Court that,
"for the past 24 years on death row he has strenuously worked to improve his intellectual functioning and academic skills. Now 64 years old, and a survivor of prostate cancer and radical surgery, Turner has spent the last quarter century doing virtually nothing but watching educational public television every day and diligently practicing his reading, communication, social sciences, and math skills. . . This hard work over the past 24 years is reflected in substantial increases in Turner’s IQ scores since childhood."
Interesting argument, but such a large increase in IQ scores make an ID/MR claim dubious and raises interesting issues about the third prong of the Dx (MR/ID during the developmental period)
- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad
intelligence intelligence testing Atkins cases ICDP blog psychology school psychology neuropsychology forensic psychology criminal psychology criminal justice death penalty capital punishment ABA IQ tests IQ scores adaptive behavior AAIDD mental retardation intellectual disability third MR/ID prong Turner v US Turner v FL
Generated by: Tag Generator
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
FYiPOST: Neuroscience and Law Webinars from the ABA and AAAS
Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad