The opening appellant brief for the Atkin's related case of Wesley Coonce (Coonce v USA, 2016) is now available for viewing here.
Monday, September 25, 2017
Atkins related case: Wesely Coonce v USA Appellants Opening Brief
The opening appellant brief for the Atkin's related case of Wesley Coonce (Coonce v USA, 2016) is now available for viewing here.
Law Review Article (Meyer, 2017): The newly informed decency of death: Hall v Florida endorses the Marsshall hypothesis in eighth ammendment review of the death penalty
The above titled law review article (Meyer, 2017: The newly informed decency of death: Hall v Florida endorses the Marshall hypothesis in eighth amendment review of the death penalty can be found here.
Flynn effect reference project
I had previously maintained a "Flynn effect archive" project at this blog. In its prior form, it included a reference list and hyperlinks to almost all articles. I have now found it necessary to remove all posts (and index tag terms) related to that project. It's purpose has changed.
Originally the idea was to make available most the available research on the Flynn effect. Over time I noticed (via the hit counter tracker) that fewer and fewer people were consulting it to obtain copies of articles. The time necessary to maintain the archive, especially after I switched domain servers (which resulted in a ton of obsolete and broken hyperlinks), was not cost-effective. Thus, that archive is no longer available.
In its place I am now maintaining (and will update periodically) a simple working list of Flynn effect (aka, norm obsolescence) references. The current version, dated 09-17-17, can be downloaded by clicking here. It includes 291 references. I will refer to this as the Flynn Effect Reference Project. I will update it on a regular basis, especially since it is now much easier to maintain.
The reference list should not be considered exhaustive of all possible published and unpublished research regarding the Flynn effect. It is the best I can put together. Any readers who locate missing articles, or new publications, should contact me via email (go to the MindHub and contact me via the contact info). I will then add those to the next update.
Enjoy.
Thursday, September 7, 2017
Evaluating WAIS–IV structure through a different psychometric lens: structural causal model discovery as an alternative to confirmatory factor analysis via BrowZine
Evaluating WAIS–IV structure through a different psychometric lens: structural causal model discovery as an alternative to confirmatory factor analysis
van Dijk, Marjolein J. A. M.; Claassen, Tom; Suwartono, Christiany; van der Veld, William M.; van der Heijden, Paul T.; Hendriks, Marc P. H.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Vol. 31 Issue 6-7 – 2017: 1141 - 1154
10.1080/13854046.2017.1352029
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1352029
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1352029
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
van Dijk, Marjolein J. A. M.; Claassen, Tom; Suwartono, Christiany; van der Veld, William M.; van der Heijden, Paul T.; Hendriks, Marc P. H.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Vol. 31 Issue 6-7 – 2017: 1141 - 1154
10.1080/13854046.2017.1352029
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1352029
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1352029
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Sharing The use of neuropsychological tests to assess intelligence via BrowZine
Gansler, David A.; Varvaris, Mark; Schretlen, David J.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Vol. 31 Issue 6-7 – 2017: 1073 - 1086
10.1080/13854046.2017.1322149
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1322149
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1322149
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Sharing Psychometrics and statistics: two pillars of neuropsychological practice via BrowZine
Hilsabeck, Robin C.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Vol. 31 Issue 6-7 – 2017: 995 - 999
10.1080/13854046.2017.1350752
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1350752
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1350752
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Saturday, August 26, 2017
The Intelligent Brain: One of the Great Courses on sale
The Intelligent Brain
1 What Is Intelligence? Probe the nature of intelligence by looking first at the phenomenon of savants—individuals who excel at a narrow mental skill. Does this qualify as…
Read it on Flipboard
Read it on thegreatcourses.com
Friday, August 25, 2017
Validation of the Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice Test (WCT) in a Mixed Clinical Sample: Establishing Classification Accuracy, Sensitivity/Specificity, and Cutoff Scores via BrowZine
Validation of the Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice Test (WCT) in a Mixed Clinical Sample: Establishing Classification Accuracy, Sensitivity/Specificity, and Cutoff Scores
Bain, Kathleen M.; Soble, Jason R.
Assessment: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073191117725172
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073191117725172
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Thursday, August 10, 2017
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rules against Flynn effect adjustment of IQ scores in Atkins death penalty cases: Black v Carpenter (2017)
A newly published 6th Circuit opinion (Black v Carpenter, 2017) rules against norm obsolescence (the Flynn effect) in the evaluation of IQ test scores in Atkins ID death penalty cases. I obviously disagree with this decision as outlined in my 2015 chapter in the AAIDD "The Death Penalty and Intellectual Disability" (Polloway, 2015).
I have no further comment at this time as my expert opinion is clearly articulated in the AAIDD publication and I will continue my efforts to educate the courts. This decision is at variance with the official positions of American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) and the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5), the two professional associations with official guidance regarding the diagnosis of ID.
This looks like another issue that might need the attention of SCOTUS.
The following section is extracted from the complete ruling.
E. Implications of the Flynn Effect
There is good reason to have pause before retroactively adjusting IQ scores downward to offset the Flynn Effect. As we noted above, see n.1, supra, the Flynn Effect describes the apparent rise in IQ scores generated by a given IQ test as time elapses from the date of that specific test’s standardization. The reported increase is an average of approximately three points per decade, meaning that for an IQ test normed in 1995, an individual who took that test in 1995 and scored 100 would be expected to score 103 on that same test if taken in 2005, and would be expected to score 106 on that same test in 2015. This does not imply that the individual is “gaining intelligence”: after all, if the same individual, in 2015, took an IQ test that was normed in 2015, we would expect him to score 100, and we would consider him to be of the same “average” intelligence that he demonstrated when he scored 100 on the 1995-normed test in 1995. Rather, the Flynn Effect implies that the longer a test has been on the market after initially being normed, the higher (on average) an individual should perform, as compared with how that individual would perform on a more recently normed IQ test.
At first glance, of course, the Flynn Effect is troubling: if scoring 70 on an IQ test in 1995 would have been sufficient to avoid execution, then why shouldn’t a score of 76 on that same test administered in 2015 (which would produce a “Flynn-adjusted” score of 70) likewise suffice to avoid execution? Further, even if IQ tests were routinely restandardized every year or two to reset the mean score to 100, and even if old IQ tests were taken off the market so as to avoid the Flynn Effect “inflation” of scores that is visible when an IQ test continues to be administered long after its initial standardization, that would only mask, but not change, the fact that IQ scores are said to be rising.
Indeed, perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the Flynn Effect is that it is true. As Dr. Tassé states in his declaration, “[t]he so-called ‘Flynn Effect’ is NOT a theory. It is a wellestablished scientific fact that the US population is gaining an average of 3 full-scale IQ points per decade.” The implications of the Flynn Effect over a longer period of time are jarring: consider a cohort of individuals who, in 1917, took an IQ test that was normed in 1917 and received “normal” scores (say, 100, on average). If we could transport that same cohort of individuals to the present day, we would expect their average score today on an IQ test normed in 2017—a century later—to be thirty points lower: 70, making them mentally retarded, on average.
Alternatively, consider a cohort of individuals who, in 2017, took an IQ test that was normed in 2017 and received “normal” scores (of 100, on average). If we could transport that same cohort of individuals to a century ago, we would expect that their average score on a test normed in 1917 would be thirty points higher: 130, making them geniuses, on average.
It thus makes little sense to use Flynn-adjusted IQ scores to determine whether a criminal is sufficiently intellectually disabled to be exempt from the death penalty. After all, if Atkins stands for the proposition that someone with an IQ score of 70 or lower in 2002 (when Atkins was decided) is exempt from the death penalty, then the use of Flynn-adjusted IQ scores would conceivably lead to the conclusion that, within the next few decades, almost no one with borderline or merely below-average IQ scores should be executed, because their scores when adjusted downward to 2002 levels would be below 70. Indeed, the Supreme Court did not amplify just what moral or medical theory led to the highly general language that it used in Atkins when it prohibited the imposition of a death sentence for criminals who are “so impaired as to fall within the range of mentally retarded offenders about whom there is a national consensus,” 536 U.S. at 317. If Atkins had been a 1917 case, the majority of the population now living—if we were to apply downward adjustments to their IQ scores to offset the Flynn Effect from 1917 until now—would be too mentally retarded to be executed; and until the Supreme Court tells us that it is committed to making such downward adjustments, we decline to do so.
* * *
COLE, Chief Judge, concurring in the opinion except for Section II.E. I concur with the majority opinion except as to the section discussing the implications of the Flynn Effect. In holding that Black did not prove that he had significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning, we concluded that Black’s childhood IQ scores would be above 70 even if we adjusted those scores to account for both the SEM and the Flynn Effect. Accordingly, I would not address the question of whether we should apply a Flynn Effect adjustment in cases generally because it is unnecessary to the resolution of Black’s appeal. Regardless, courts, including our own in Black I, have regarded the Flynn Effect as an important consideration in determining who qualifies as intellectually disabled. See, e.g., Black v. Bell, 664 F.3d 81, 95–96 (6th Cir. 2011); Walker v. True, 399 F.3d 315, 322–23 (4th Cir. 2005).
I have no further comment at this time as my expert opinion is clearly articulated in the AAIDD publication and I will continue my efforts to educate the courts. This decision is at variance with the official positions of American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) and the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5), the two professional associations with official guidance regarding the diagnosis of ID.
This looks like another issue that might need the attention of SCOTUS.
The following section is extracted from the complete ruling.
E. Implications of the Flynn Effect
There is good reason to have pause before retroactively adjusting IQ scores downward to offset the Flynn Effect. As we noted above, see n.1, supra, the Flynn Effect describes the apparent rise in IQ scores generated by a given IQ test as time elapses from the date of that specific test’s standardization. The reported increase is an average of approximately three points per decade, meaning that for an IQ test normed in 1995, an individual who took that test in 1995 and scored 100 would be expected to score 103 on that same test if taken in 2005, and would be expected to score 106 on that same test in 2015. This does not imply that the individual is “gaining intelligence”: after all, if the same individual, in 2015, took an IQ test that was normed in 2015, we would expect him to score 100, and we would consider him to be of the same “average” intelligence that he demonstrated when he scored 100 on the 1995-normed test in 1995. Rather, the Flynn Effect implies that the longer a test has been on the market after initially being normed, the higher (on average) an individual should perform, as compared with how that individual would perform on a more recently normed IQ test.
At first glance, of course, the Flynn Effect is troubling: if scoring 70 on an IQ test in 1995 would have been sufficient to avoid execution, then why shouldn’t a score of 76 on that same test administered in 2015 (which would produce a “Flynn-adjusted” score of 70) likewise suffice to avoid execution? Further, even if IQ tests were routinely restandardized every year or two to reset the mean score to 100, and even if old IQ tests were taken off the market so as to avoid the Flynn Effect “inflation” of scores that is visible when an IQ test continues to be administered long after its initial standardization, that would only mask, but not change, the fact that IQ scores are said to be rising.
Indeed, perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the Flynn Effect is that it is true. As Dr. Tassé states in his declaration, “[t]he so-called ‘Flynn Effect’ is NOT a theory. It is a wellestablished scientific fact that the US population is gaining an average of 3 full-scale IQ points per decade.” The implications of the Flynn Effect over a longer period of time are jarring: consider a cohort of individuals who, in 1917, took an IQ test that was normed in 1917 and received “normal” scores (say, 100, on average). If we could transport that same cohort of individuals to the present day, we would expect their average score today on an IQ test normed in 2017—a century later—to be thirty points lower: 70, making them mentally retarded, on average.
Alternatively, consider a cohort of individuals who, in 2017, took an IQ test that was normed in 2017 and received “normal” scores (of 100, on average). If we could transport that same cohort of individuals to a century ago, we would expect that their average score on a test normed in 1917 would be thirty points higher: 130, making them geniuses, on average.
It thus makes little sense to use Flynn-adjusted IQ scores to determine whether a criminal is sufficiently intellectually disabled to be exempt from the death penalty. After all, if Atkins stands for the proposition that someone with an IQ score of 70 or lower in 2002 (when Atkins was decided) is exempt from the death penalty, then the use of Flynn-adjusted IQ scores would conceivably lead to the conclusion that, within the next few decades, almost no one with borderline or merely below-average IQ scores should be executed, because their scores when adjusted downward to 2002 levels would be below 70. Indeed, the Supreme Court did not amplify just what moral or medical theory led to the highly general language that it used in Atkins when it prohibited the imposition of a death sentence for criminals who are “so impaired as to fall within the range of mentally retarded offenders about whom there is a national consensus,” 536 U.S. at 317. If Atkins had been a 1917 case, the majority of the population now living—if we were to apply downward adjustments to their IQ scores to offset the Flynn Effect from 1917 until now—would be too mentally retarded to be executed; and until the Supreme Court tells us that it is committed to making such downward adjustments, we decline to do so.
* * *
COLE, Chief Judge, concurring in the opinion except for Section II.E. I concur with the majority opinion except as to the section discussing the implications of the Flynn Effect. In holding that Black did not prove that he had significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning, we concluded that Black’s childhood IQ scores would be above 70 even if we adjusted those scores to account for both the SEM and the Flynn Effect. Accordingly, I would not address the question of whether we should apply a Flynn Effect adjustment in cases generally because it is unnecessary to the resolution of Black’s appeal. Regardless, courts, including our own in Black I, have regarded the Flynn Effect as an important consideration in determining who qualifies as intellectually disabled. See, e.g., Black v. Bell, 664 F.3d 81, 95–96 (6th Cir. 2011); Walker v. True, 399 F.3d 315, 322–23 (4th Cir. 2005).
Sunday, August 6, 2017
Sharing The Flynn effect for verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory: A cross-temporal meta-analysis via BrowZine
The Flynn effect for verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory: A cross-temporal meta-analysis
Wongupparaj, Peera; Wongupparaj, Rangsirat; Kumari, Veena; Morris, Robin G.
Intelligence: Vol. 64 – 2017: 71 - 80
10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.006
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300988
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300988
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Wongupparaj, Peera; Wongupparaj, Rangsirat; Kumari, Veena; Morris, Robin G.
Intelligence: Vol. 64 – 2017: 71 - 80
10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.006
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300988
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300988
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Thursday, July 27, 2017
APA Handbook of Forensic Neuropsychology
APA Handbook of Forensic Neuropsychology
List Price: $199.00 Member/Affiliate Price: $129.00 Quantity: FREE SHIPPING For individuals in the U.S. & U.S. territories Pages: 528 Item #: 4311532 ISBN:…
Read it on Flipboard
Read it on apa.org
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Time processing in children with mathematical difficulties via BrowZine
Cester, Ilaria; Mioni, Giovanna; Cornoldi, Cesare
Learning and Individual Differences: Vol. 58 – 2017: 22 - 30
10.1016/j.lindif.2017.07.005
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608017301280
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608017301280
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Saturday, July 22, 2017
Evaluating WAIS–IV structure through a different psychometric lens: structural causal model discovery as an alternative to confirmatory factor analysis via BrowZine
van Dijk, Marjolein J. A. M.; Claassen, Tom; Suwartono, Christiany; van der Veld, William M.; van der Heijden, Paul T.; Hendriks, Marc P. H.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/144497457/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1352029
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Disconnected lives: Women with intellectual disabilities in conflict with the law via BrowZine
Disconnected lives: Women with intellectual disabilities in conflict with the law
Levine, Kathryn Ann; Proulx, Jocelyn; Schwartz, Karen
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/142756581/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.12387/pdf
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Levine, Kathryn Ann; Proulx, Jocelyn; Schwartz, Karen
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/142756581/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.12387/pdf
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Science, Technology, Society, and Law via BrowZine
Science, Technology, Society, and Law
Cole, Simon A.; Bertenthal, Alyse
Annual Review of Law and Social Science: Vol. 13 Issue 1 – 2017:
10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113550
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113550
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113550
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Cole, Simon A.; Bertenthal, Alyse
Annual Review of Law and Social Science: Vol. 13 Issue 1 – 2017:
10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113550
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113550
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113550
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Saturday, July 1, 2017
Research Byte: Reliability of competence and sanity opinions---a meta-analysis
Click on image to enlarge
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
"Intelligent" intelligence testing with Wechsler Arithmetic test
This article is a good reminder that "intelligent" intelligence testing requires "knowing thy subtests."
The authors conclude "In summary, while Arithmetic may be considered a measure of concentration or working memory, it should be kept in mind that many other factors influence it and that its specificity as a concentration measure is limited."
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
The authors conclude "In summary, while Arithmetic may be considered a measure of concentration or working memory, it should be kept in mind that many other factors influence it and that its specificity as a concentration measure is limited."
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Wednesday, June 28, 2017
The Diagnosis of Mental Disorders Is Influenced by Automatic Causal Reasoning via BrowZine
Flores, Amanda; Cobos, Pedro L.; Hagmayer, York
Clinical Psychological Science: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/109590019/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2167702617709560
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Monday, June 19, 2017
Coping, Emotion Regulation, and Psychopathology in Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analysis and Narrative Review. via BrowZine
Compas, Bruce E.; Jaser, Sarah S.; Bettis, Alexandra H.; Watson, Kelly H.; Gruhn, Meredith A.; Dunbar, Jennifer P.; Williams, Ellen; Thigpen, Jennifer C.
Psychological Bulletin: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/107457505/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/bul0000110
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
**
Emotion and the Prefrontal Cortex: An Integrative Review. via BrowZine
Dixon, Matthew L.; Thiruchselvam, Ravi; Todd, Rebecca; Christoff, Kalina
Psychological Bulletin: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/107457508/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/bul0000096
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Sunday, June 11, 2017
Field reliability of competency and sanity opinions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. via BrowZine
Field reliability of competency and sanity opinions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guarnera, Lucy A.; Murrie, Daniel C.
Psychological Assessment: Vol. 29 Issue 6 – 2017: 795 - 818
10.1037/pas0000388
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000388
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000388
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Guarnera, Lucy A.; Murrie, Daniel C.
Psychological Assessment: Vol. 29 Issue 6 – 2017: 795 - 818
10.1037/pas0000388
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000388
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000388
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Taking forensic mental health assessment “out of the lab” and into “the real world”: Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures. via BrowZine
Taking forensic mental health assessment "out of the lab" and into "the real world": Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures.
Edens, John F.; Boccaccini, Marcus T.
Psychological Assessment: Vol. 29 Issue 6 – 2017: 599 - 610
10.1037/pas0000475
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000475
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000475
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Edens, John F.; Boccaccini, Marcus T.
Psychological Assessment: Vol. 29 Issue 6 – 2017: 599 - 610
10.1037/pas0000475
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000475
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pas0000475
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
Invalid before impaired: an emerging paradox of embedded validity indicators via BrowZine
File under the assessment of malingering
Invalid before impaired: an emerging paradox of embedded validity indicators
Erdodi, Laszlo A.; Lichtenstein, Jonathan D.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/104029700/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1323119
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Invalid before impaired: an emerging paradox of embedded validity indicators
Erdodi, Laszlo A.; Lichtenstein, Jonathan D.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/104029700/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1323119
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Thursday, May 11, 2017
False confessions via BrowZine
False confessions
Kassin, Saul M.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/100524171/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcs.1439/pdf
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Kassin, Saul M.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://api.thirdiron.com/v2/libraries/56/articles/100524171/content
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcs.1439/pdf
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Tuesday, May 9, 2017
Preserved cognitive functions with age are determined by domain-dependent shifts in network responsivity
Preserved cognitive functions with age are determined by domain-dependent shifts in network responsivity
Altmetric: 28 More detail Article | Open Dávid Samu • , Karen L. Campbell • , Kamen A.…
Read it on Flipboard
Read it on nature.com
******************************************************
Kevin McGrew, PhD
Educational Psychologist
Director, Institute for Applied Psychometrics
IAP
******************************************************
Wednesday, May 3, 2017
Monday, April 24, 2017
Sharing The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: from alpha to omega via BrowZine
The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: from alpha to omega
Watkins, Marley W.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Watkins, Marley W.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Sharing Evaluation of multidimensional models of WAIS-IV subtest performance via BrowZine
Evaluation of multidimensional models of WAIS-IV subtest performance
McFarland, Dennis J.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1320426
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1320426
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
McFarland, Dennis J.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist: Articles in press
University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1320426
Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13854046.2017.1320426
Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)